Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines

Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed  a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans

The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public.

The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.”

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:

Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients’ lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3

To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made.

The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.


5 thoughts on “Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines

  1. […] Read the rest here: Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines « Heidi … […]

  2. View Voyeur says:


    Health Freedom Leaders Join Forces to
    Stop FDA Approval of Swine Flu Vaccines Without ANY Safety Testing

    Read Legal Call for Relief Here:

    Take Action! Help Prevent FDA from Approving Pandemic Vaccines for Use on All of Us Absent ALL Safety Testing

    1. Say “NO!” to Forced Vaccination

    Join the New Citizens Petition! Stop FDA Approval for Untested Vaccines

    At last! An effective and powerful legal action with the potential to stop the FDA’s planned approval of Swine Flu Vaccines without any, repeat ANY, safety testing. Three far sighted health freedom leaders have banded together to take action to protect us all and invite your help, and your organization’s help, too.

    2. Join in: Demand FDA NOT Approve Vaccines Before Completion of Safety Testing

    Remember: Take Actions 1 and 2 Once for Each Member of Your Household

    3. Representatives of Organizations Click Here:

    Note: Take action 3 in addition to Actions 1 and 2 if you represent an organization

    Not the signatory for your organization? Contact your organization’s leaders and urge them to participate in this democratic legal exercise. No charge, no downside – just benefits for all!

    4. Mere Days Left to Save Health Freedom…

    Right, our 3 Weeks Nearly over. Senate Reconvenes Sept. 7.
    We MUST Prevent Passage of HR 2749 Equivalent Bill


    We, you and the Natural Solutions Foundation, ARE the net roots of health freedom. We can – and do! – produce literally millions of emails, raising our voices high enough to push back the madness. In fact, we’ve already sent more than 1.5 million emails demanding the right to say “No!” to pandemic vaccines. Well, it is time for more of same!

    If you have not yet clicked on the Action Item demanding the right to say NO! to the vaccine without then going to jail, now is the right time to do so for every member of your family:

    Click here,

    To safeguard your right to say “NO!” to dangerous vaccines and click here,

    To tell the FDA that untested, unnecessary, unsafe and un-insurable vaccines are not acceptable.

  3. […] , and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies. … The rest is here: Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines « Heidi … Posted in H1N1 Shot Risks, H1N1 Shot Side Effects. Tags: cost, current-vaccine, deliver-vaccines, […]

  4. View Voyeur says:

    Experimental Swine Flu Vaccines Contain a Smorgasbord of Potentially Deadly Additives
    Bill Lindner
    September 18, 2009
    Trials are beginning on Novartis’ H1N1 vaccine and Novartis is recommending that children participating in the trial receive two doses of the experimental vaccine that reportedly contains ingredients found in spermicides, cleaners, and cosmetics as well as thimerosal and squalene (MF-59) — raising concerns because the only safety checks for the children participating in the tests are a few blood draws and follow-up phone calls but no neurological testing, and adverse reactions to the Swine Flu vaccines being tested are being purposely omitted by researchers.

    Despite the fact that the Government is giving the Pharmaceutical companies total impunity from any and all damages the populations receive as a result of their experimental cocktail, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) continues insisting that the new vaccine will be safe and effective. Experts — there’s that oft-deceptive word again — are saying we can trust the experimental vaccine because the technology used to create it is time tested. As you’ll see below, these so-called ‘experts’ are intentionally deceiving the public once again. The answer to the question I asked a couple of months ago — Swine Flu outbreak or bioterrorism and intent to commit mass murder? — is becoming increasingly clear.

    As the information below reveals, these ‘experts’ from various government agencies are once again purposely cherry picking and ignoring information with the intention of deceiving, knowing full well that many people could die while trying to push their treachery off as the truth. The government has had a major aversion to the truth for years.

    Participants of the study being conducted on children were not allowed to know the exact ingredients of the experimental vaccine on the grounds that it was a study and that the information is privileged. However, there are some clues that can be obtained from the parental consent form.

    Squalene Linked to Gulf War Syndrome and ALS

    Page two of the form informs you that MF-59 is an adjuvant that is used in influenza vaccines licensed for adults and/or the elderly in many countries, but not in the United States. So, if children are being used as guinea pigs in the study, why is vaccine that is licensed for adults and/or the elderly going to be used on newborns, children and pregnant women?

    MF-59 (Squalene) is listed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine as being too dangerous for human use. Squalene is not licensed for use in the U.S. The anthrax vaccine used on Gulf War veterans in the early 1990’s was laced with Squalene. It is known to have had disastrous consequences, which include Gulf War Syndrome and ALS. Information on the toxicity and adverse effects of Squalene are available from the National Library of Medicine.

    In 2006, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny wrote an article noting the dangers of Squalene. Squalene is manufactured naturally in the liver as a precursor for cholesterol. Ingested Squalene is different from injected Squalene. When Squalene is injected, it can lead to self-destructive immune responses such as autoimmune arthritis and lupus. Squalene in MF-59 can cross react with the body’s Squalene on the surface of human cells. Destruction of the body’s own Squalene can lead to the diseases mentioned above and other central nervous system diseases.

    Novartis has not performed testing for the carcinogenicity of MF-59 adjuvant or any of their other preventive vaccines and has no plans to.

    Further down the parental consent form — while not explicitly mentioned as ingredients — it is noted that if your child had an allergic reaction in the past to neomycin or polymyxin, sodium ethylmercurothiosalicylate or thimerosal (mercury containing compounds often used as preservatives in vaccines), beta propriolactone or nonoxynol 9 (commonly used in cleaners, cosmetics and spermicides) you must tell the medical staff. People with egg allergies should avoid the Swine Flu vaccine.
    Read more:

  5. At its worst, this sort of fear can produce dangerously bad pharmaceuticals and hurried vaccines that are not suitable for mass use. Nature Biotechnology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s